Dataciencia

Colección SciELO Chile

Neostructuralism through strategic transaction: The geopolinomics of China's Dragon Doctrine for Latin America

Indexado

WoS	WOS:000455289300009
Scopus	SCOPUS_ID:85047821811

DOI

10.1016/J.POLGEO.2018.05.002

Año

2018

Tipo

artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras

Revista

Revista	ISSN
Political Geography	0962-6298

Métricas Externas

PlumX	Altmetric	Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Plumx: https://plumanalytics.com/learn/about-metrics/
Altmetric: https://www.altmetric.com/about-altmetrics/what-are-altmetrics/
Dimensions: https://www.dimensions.ai/why-dimensions/

Disciplinas de Investigación

WOS
Political Science
Geography

Scopus
History
Sociology And Political Science
Geography, Planning And Development

SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional

Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.

Autores - Afiliación

Ord.	Autor	Género	Institución - País
1	BARTON-CANT, JONATHAN RICHARD	Hombre	Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
2	Rehner, Johannes	Hombre	Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Financiamiento

Fuente
CONICYT
Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
ComisiÃ³n Nacional de InvestigaciÃ³n CientÃfica y TecnolÃ³gica
Consejo Nacional de Innovacion, Ciencia y Tecnologia
Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo CientÃfico y TecnolÃ³gico
New Zealand Royal Society Marsden Fund
Royal Society Te Aparangi

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos

Agradecimiento
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the CONICYT (Fondecyt Regular 1161417 and Fondecyt Regular 1150636), the New Zealand Royal Society Marsden Fund (VUW1423), and the contributions of Roberto Salas and Pablo Salinas in creating the graphics.
A discussion of this project has to be set against recent diplomacy in Central America. Several Central American states maintained diplomatic relations with Taiwan rather than switch allegiance PR China, as the US did in 1973. While, surprisingly, Costa Rica switched sides to PR China in 2006, mainly due to economic interests, Nicaragua remains a partner of Taiwan and not of the PR China: Nicaragua has a FTA with Taiwan. President Ortega, in spite of his left-leaning ideological orientation, maintained the diplomatic support of Taiwan due to its consistent financial support through development projects, frequently criticized as “checkbook diplomacy”, as well as private Taiwanese investment. Diplomatic and personal differences with the Chinese leadership dating back to the 1980s also hindered a closer relationship with China ( Rodriguez, 2013 ).

Agradecimiento

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the CONICYT (Fondecyt Regular 1161417 and Fondecyt Regular 1150636), the New Zealand Royal Society Marsden Fund (VUW1423), and the contributions of Roberto Salas and Pablo Salinas in creating the graphics.

A discussion of this project has to be set against recent diplomacy in Central America. Several Central American states maintained diplomatic relations with Taiwan rather than switch allegiance PR China, as the US did in 1973. While, surprisingly, Costa Rica switched sides to PR China in 2006, mainly due to economic interests, Nicaragua remains a partner of Taiwan and not of the PR China: Nicaragua has a FTA with Taiwan. President Ortega, in spite of his left-leaning ideological orientation, maintained the diplomatic support of Taiwan due to its consistent financial support through development projects, frequently criticized as “checkbook diplomacy”, as well as private Taiwanese investment. Diplomatic and personal differences with the Chinese leadership dating back to the 1980s also hindered a closer relationship with China ( Rodriguez, 2013 ).