Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||
| DOI | 10.20901/PM.55.4.02 | ||
| Año | 2018 | ||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
If these readings of Seneca are plausible, genealogies of modern concepts that interpret their emergence as a revolutionary Trennung (e.g. Schmitt and early Conceptual History) (Lehmann and Van Horn Melton, 1994; Lehmann and Richter, 1996) could be facing a problem of omission. The conceptual support for the process through which the medieval social and political world was destroyed and substituted by modernity does not come from Cicero's republican tradition, but from a monarchical notion of unity among the governor and the governed; an idea defended by Seneca, according to which absolute sovereignty would guarantee private property, contracts, and a sui iuris apolitical soul.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bustamante Kuschel, Gonzalo | Hombre |
Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez - Chile
|
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| I would like to thank Karen Petz for her help with the English language revision of my original article and to my assistant Rodrigo Villalobos. I also want to express my gratitude towards Prof. Luka Ribarevic for kindly inviting me to the Summer School of the Faculty of Political Sciences at University of Zagreb (Groznjan, 2017), where I was able to present my ideas, some of which made it into this work, before an outstanding group of students and professors. This article is part of research project Fondecyt 1170869. |