Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2010.01.007 | ||
| Año | 2010 | ||
| Tipo |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Recent studies have focused on the study of social networks among local resource users, but few have attempted to study co-management networks. The objective of the research was to assess the Chilean shellfish co-management system from an organizational network perspective. Starting with one detailed case study, representatives of 38 small-scale fisher associations from two administrative regions were interviewed to investigate: (1) networks of actors in each co-management case, (2) the functions of these actors in co-management, and (3) fisher perceptions about Chile's co-management arrangement. Results indicate that decision-making is highly centralized and power is concentrated in government, with little horizontal exchange and cooperation among fisher associations. However, the network approach indicates the presence of a rich set of players, some seven sets of actors by function. Grassroots management innovations are hampered by the existing co-management structure, suggesting that the system may benefit from a modification of the policy to allow greater learning-by-doing and flexibility. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MARIN-RICKE, ANDRES | Hombre |
University of Manitoba - Canadá
|
| 2 | Berkes, Fikret | Hombre |
University of Manitoba - Canadá
|
| Fuente |
|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada |
| Canada Research Chairs |
| Canada Research Chair |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| The authors would like to thank the fisher organizations that participated in the study, and especially Caleta Montemar. We thank Dr. J.C. Castilla and Dr. S. Gelcich from the Universidad Católica de Chile for advice and for covering some of the field research costs (grants Fondap-Fondecyt 1501-0001 and Fondecyt 11070034). The research was supported by the Canada Research Chair in Community-Based Resource Management and the SSHRC with grants to Fikret Berkes. |