In this paper two dichotomous visions are exposed about the impact that the emergence of an artificial intelligence, equivalent or superior to the human intelligence, will have on our lives. The first one exposes that the I.A. will have a negative effect, and that will even be the worst thing that can happen to us as. The second, on the other hand, maintains a positive stance, since it postulates that the I.A. would be the best thing that could happen to humanity. The hypothesis of the present work is that the analysis of both positions allows to elucidate that the problem is not in the I.A. itself, but rather in the understanding that human beings have of it, in the concept that we have (or will have) of it.