Colección SciELO Chile

Departamento Gestión de Conocimiento, Monitoreo y Prospección
Consultas o comentarios: productividad@anid.cl
Búsqueda Publicación
Búsqueda por Tema Título, Abstract y Keywords



Social hierarchy and feed supplementation of heifers: Line or piles?
Indexado
WoS WOS:000500193700003
Scopus SCOPUS_ID:85070757744
DOI 10.1016/J.APPLANIM.2019.104852
Año 2019
Tipo artículo de investigación

Citas Totales

Autores Afiliación Chile

Instituciones Chile

% Participación
Internacional

Autores
Afiliación Extranjera

Instituciones
Extranjeras


Abstract



Cattle on pasture may have unequal access to grain supplement due to the effect of social dominance. Subordinate animals are known to have less access to resources when competition exists. This trial was designed to test if distributing feed supplement (corn meal) along and under the fence in individual piles would affect heifers feeding behaviour and grant better access to all animals compared to supplement offered in a continuous line. Four groups of nine heifers were used in a 2 x 2 cross-over design, and tested in two treatments: LINE (1 linear meter/animal) and PILE (one pile/heifer distant 1m from each other). Each period had 3 days for habituation followed by 7 days for data collection. Animals were managed under Voisin's rotational grazing system and observed for one hour from the moment they entered the new paddock (8:00 to 9:00). Individual behaviour of the heifers / grazing, eating grain supplement, competing or other) was registered at one-minute interval instantaneous scans. All agonistic interactions were recorded and a sociometric matrix was calculated for each group to define each heifer as dominant, intermediate or subordinate. Feeding behaviour as not affected by treatment, but it affected by social hierarchy status. High and intermediate ranking heifers spent more time eating supplement than low ranking ones (P <= 0.03). Subordinate heifers grazed longer than intermediate heifers, which in turn grazed longer than dominant heifers (P <= 0.01). Social rank did not affect competitive behaviour, but there was a trend for more competition events when concentrate was distributed in piles (P = 0.09). Dominance score was associated with initial body weight (r = 0.686; P <= 0.0001). In summary, distributing the grain supplement in individual piles did not benefit the subordinate heifers, as they had less access to the supplement than the dominant ones. When entering a new paddock with supplement offered, the subordinate heifers seemed to avoid competing for grain and spent more time grazing while the dominant heifers spent more time eating supplement.

Métricas Externas



PlumX Altmetric Dimensions

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación



WOS
Veterinary Sciences
Behavioral Sciences
Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science
Scopus
Animal Science And Zoology
Food Animals
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional



Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.


Autores - Afiliación



Ord. Autor Género Institución - País
1 Bica, Gabriela Schenato Mujer UNIV FED SANTA CATARINA - Brasil
UNIV FED PARANA - Brasil
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Brasil
Universidade Federal do Paraná - Brasil
2 Lemos Teixeira, Dayane - UNIV FED SANTA CATARINA - Brasil
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Chile
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Brasil
3 Hötzel, Maria José Mujer UNIV FED SANTA CATARINA - Brasil
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Brasil
4 Machado Filho, L. C. P. - UNIV FED SANTA CATARINA - Brasil
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Brasil
4 Machado Filho, Luiz Carlos Pinheiro - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Brasil

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Origen de Citas Identificadas



Muestra la distribución de países cuyos autores citan a la publicación consultada.

Citas identificadas: Las citas provienen de documentos incluidos en la base de datos de DATACIENCIA

Citas Identificadas: 16.67 %
Citas No-identificadas: 83.33 %

Muestra la distribución de instituciones nacionales o extranjeras cuyos autores citan a la publicación consultada.

Citas identificadas: Las citas provienen de documentos incluidos en la base de datos de DATACIENCIA

Citas Identificadas: 16.67 %
Citas No-identificadas: 83.33 %

Financiamiento



Fuente
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
CNPq PQ
CNPq (National Council on Scientific and Technological Development)
National Council on Scientific and Technological Development
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos



Agradecimiento
This study was funded by CNPq (National Council on Scientific and Technological Development), through the Project no 487870/2013-1, call no 81/2013. LCPMF and MJH received CNPq PQ fellowships. We thank Alexandre Bernardi, Ana Beatriz Torres Almeida, Dennis Craesmeyer, Jessica Rocha Medeiros and Karolini Tenffen de Sousa for their help during the experiment.
This study was funded by CNPq (National Council on Scientific and Technological Development), through the Project n◦ 487870/2013-1, call nº 81/2013. LCPMF and MJH received CNPq PQ fellowships. We thank Alexandre Bernardi, Ana Beatriz Torres Almeida, Dennis Craesmeyer, Jessica Rocha Medeiros and Karolini Tenffen de Sousa for their help during the experiment.

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.