Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.PECON.2019.09.002 | ||||
| Año | 2019 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
Forest and landscape restoration (FLR) could benefit from the land sharing/sparing approaches to support decisions. We discuss four questions potentially shaping FLR outcomes in agricultural landscapes in the context of land sharing/sparing decisions: (1) Which are the main focuses of restorative interventions?; (2) Which kind of restored forests should these interventions target?; (3) Which restorative interventions should be implemented and where?; and (4) What are the major factors influencing restoration outcomes? Some restorative interventions embraced by FLR may compete with specific land uses and thus require careful planning to minimize trade-offs and maximize synergies. Decision making on the restorative intervention combination needs considering the spatial distribution and configuration of the final land uses in the landscape together with its social context and a multi-stakeholder process. Ultimately, finding the right balance between land sharing/sparing approaches will also require navigating governance issues that regulate FLR implementation. (C) 2019 Associacdo Brasileira de Ciencia Ecologica e Conservacao. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meli, Paula | Mujer |
UNIV SAO PAULO - Brasil
Universidad de La Frontera - Chile Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP - Brasil Universidade de São Paulo - Brasil |
| 2 | REY-BENAYAS, JOSE MARIA | Hombre |
Univ Alcala De Henares - España
Universidad de Alcalá - España Univ Alcala - España |
| 3 | Brancalion, Pedro H.S. | Hombre |
UNIV SAO PAULO - Brasil
Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP - Brasil Universidade de São Paulo - Brasil |
| Fuente |
|---|
| São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) |
| Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation |
| Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico |
| Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo |
| Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación |
| S?o Paulo Research Foundation |
| "Campos de Vida" from the FIRE |
| Government of Madrid |
| National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq) |
| National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil |
| FIRE |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| We are indebted to E. Bennett and B. Phalan for their great contributions to early versions of this manuscript. This work was supported by a Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) postdoctoral grant to PM (2016/00052-9) and a productivity grant from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq) to PHBS (304817/2015-5). JMRB is supported by projects CGL2014-53308-P from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, S2013/MAE-2719 "REMEDINAL-3" from the Government of Madrid, and "Campos de Vida" from the FIRE (www.fundacionfire.org). |
| We are indebted to E. Bennett and B. Phalan for their great contributions to early versions of this manuscript. This work was supported by a S?o Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) postdoctoral grant to PM (2016/00052-9) and a productivity grant from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq) to PHBS (304817/2015-5). JMRB is supported by projects CGL2014- 53308- P from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, S2013/MAE- 2719 ?REMEDINAL- 3? from the Government of Madrid, and ?Campos de Vida? from the FIRE (www.fundacionfire.org). |