Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| Indexado |
|
||||
| DOI | 10.1016/J.ANIREPROSCI.2008.10.013 | ||||
| Año | 2009 | ||||
| Tipo | artículo de investigación |
Citas Totales
Autores Afiliación Chile
Instituciones Chile
% Participación
Internacional
Autores
Afiliación Extranjera
Instituciones
Extranjeras
The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of reduced doses of cloprostenol for synchronizing estrus and ovulation in hair sheep. With the aim to evaluate the luteolytic activity of reduced cloprostenol doses, a first experiment was performed using a relatively large (group H: 126 p,g; n=8), medium (group M: 68.25 mu g; n=6) and small (group L: 38.5 mu g; n=6) cloprostenol dose. Luteolysis was assessed at Days 3 and 6 after injection (Day 0) by progesterone concentrations (P-4) and transrectal ultrasonography (US). In Experiment 2, sheep were randomly assigned to the same three closes to evaluate a protocol for estrous synchronization using two injections administered 9 days apart. A third trial was performed with ewes treated (9 days apart) with the large dose (H=126 mu g; n=12) and with a small dose adjusted for facilitating volume management (LA=43.75 mu g; n=12). Presence of estrous cycling was determined in all the ewes by US and P4 assay, at Days -9, -6, -2, 0 (Day of second cloprostenol injection), 8 and 11. Bleeding and US were done every 4 h from 16 h of the beginning of the estrus during the third trial to assess the preovulatory LH surge and timing of ovulation. Additionally, blood samples were drawn at Days 0, 1, 2 and 3 to assess estradiol (Experiments 2 and 3) and P4 (Experiment 2) concentrations during the ovarian follicular phase. In all experiments, percentage of animals showing luteolysis, preovulatory follicular dynamics and function and percentage of ewes showing behavioral estrus in response to treatment was similar among groups. Timing of estrus for group H was earlier than group L (28.6 +/- 1.8 h compared with 37.1 +/- 2.4 h; P<0.05). In the third trial, the preovulatory LH peak was higher in the LA group than group H, in terms of maximum mean concentration during the surge (27.7 +/- 1.8 ng/mL compared with 21.3 +/- 2.2 ng/mL; P<0.05) and area under the curve (AUC; 183.4 +/- 12.7 ng/mL compared with 127.7 +/- 10.9 ng/mL; P<0.01). However, timing of ovulation was similar for H and LA groups. Thereafter, ovulation rate and luteal function at Day 11 were similar. Current results demonstrate that reduced doses of cloprostenol may be applied in a practical manner for reproductive management of sheep, with the additional advantage of reducing treatment costs. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
| Ord. | Autor | Género | Institución - País |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Contreras-Solis, Ignacio | Hombre |
CENT UNIV VENEZUELA - Venezuela
Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias - España Universidad Central de Venezuela - Venezuela Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria - España CSIC-INIA - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria - España |
| 2 | VASQUEZ-PASTENE, BELGICA-KATUSCHA | - |
Inst Nacl Invest Agr - Venezuela
Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agricolas, Venezuela - Venezuela |
| 3 | DIAZ DEL VALLE-ZAMBRANO, THAIS | - |
CENT UNIV VENEZUELA - Venezuela
Universidad Central de Venezuela - Venezuela |
| 4 | LETELIER-VELASQUEZ, CLAUDIA AIDA | Mujer |
Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias - España
Universidad Austral de Chile - Chile Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria - España CSIC-INIA - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria - España |
| 5 | Lopez-Sebastian, A. | - |
Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias - España
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria - España CSIC-INIA - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria - España |
| 6 | Gonzalez-Bulnes, Antonio | Hombre |
Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias - España
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria - España CSIC-INIA - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria - España |
| Fuente |
|---|
| Fonacit |
| CDCH-UCV |
| Fondo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
| Fondo Nacional de Ciencia TecnologÃa e Innovación |
| Consejo de Desarrollo CientÃfico y HumanÃstico, Universidad Central de Venezuela |
| Consejo de Desarrollo Científico y Humanístico, Universidad Central de Venezuela |
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| Critical revision of the manuscript was done by L. Dickson is gratefully acknowledged. Authors thank to staff from CENIAP for their help during this study. Also, thanks to FONACIT (project S1-2002000413) and CDCH-UCV for their financial support. |
| Critical revision of the manuscript was done by L. Dickson is gratefully acknowledged. Authors thank to staff from CENIAP for their help during this study. Also, thanks to FONACIT (project S1-2002000413) and CDCH-UCV for their financial support. |